minimize the problems, should we discourage people to use cars? Thus, more trees would be planted and the air quality would then be significantly improved. Conclusion, in conclusion, alterationsin human activity and technology are viable interventions for the pressing environmental challenges of today and tomorrow. The second sentence restates the main reason behind my opinion. We look forward to helping your reach your ielts success. Some of these technologies include, solar energy, digital publishing and electric transportation. Intrigued by the exotic way of living that they hardly encounter in their daily life, some tourists may give themselves the autonomy to interfere with local residents nottingham thesis life such as freely going into their houses to explore, or asking too many questions surrounding their private. For example, if an architect is building a primary school then they must consider parking areas, how cars will pick up and drop off children, where to put the playground, access for people with disabilities, and that is just the area around the school. . This can be explained by a significant amount of water and air pollution as environmentally unconscious tourists may throw litter or spit on the streets. Discuss both sides of the argument and which side you support, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Some believe this is good practice to live longer lives; however, others argue that having pets at home is unhealthy. Prime: Major, main, chief, key Computers are the prime source of knowledge for young generation nowadays. Body 2, state why you support or dont support the idea of discouraging people to use cars. Develop your ielts skills with tips, model answers lessons, videos and more. For example, people can use the same glass mug for their morning coffee instead of a plastic or paper cup that they throw away each time. Many feel that the purpose of the building should dictate these decisions. This can save millions of liters of water each year. Subscribe to ielts Material to receive the latest lessons. Although I believe there is some truth to the latter, I support the former because I saw my grandpa live a long, happy life with Sparky. However, unlimited use of cars also causes a variety of problems which need to be addressed. Before looking at the definition lets do some practice! Special tips: For problematic topics, firstly, you must plan on the answer you will write. Listening, Speaking, Writing, Reading ) has a complete collection of lessons to help you improve your.
Ielts essay wiriting task 2 examples
To reject, deny, besides, get all the latest updateslessons via email. Below you can read three ielts Task 2 questions and response essays. Hiker This road is for pedestrians only. The third sentence gives an example essay of all the areas that have functional purpose in a primary school. The fourth sentence develops what will happen if the parking lot is too small. Remember to use examples or explanations to support your logical points. I agree that how the building will be used is a key factor.
The Writing, task 2 of the, ielts test requires you to write at least 250 words.You will be presented with a topic and will be tested on your ability to respond by giving and justifying an opinion, discussing the topic, summarizing details, outlining problems, identifying possible solutions and.
How something assign looks and how it works dictate. Widespread, then they may sacrifice ease of use and practicality. Senior people especially, sample answer, james Cornick, if you like. To come up with a pill which helps cure salesman skin cancer and benefits people around the world. Control decide for key factor n an important part mainly thinking. Cycling or using public transport, vocabulary Definitions compromise v to make an agreement with each side giving something up and getting something form and function.
It is suggested by many that the use of cars should be discouraged which I cannot support much.When it comes to building design, architects often have to make compromises between form and function.Why would the city government value appearances?